• Companies
  • Contact
  • Français
  • Search icon
Logo Roctest
    • Products
    • Applications
    • Services
    • Case studies
    • Resources
    • About
      • About Us
      • News
      • Events
      • Careers
      • Contact
Close icon Close icon Logo Roctest
  • Search icon
    • Products
    • Applications
    • Services
    • Case studies
    • Resources
    • About
      • About Us
      • News
      • Events
      • Careers
      • Contact
  • Companies
  • Contact
  • Français
  • Logo linkedin
  • Logo youtube
Home » Case studies » New Mexico I10 Bridge

New Mexico I10 Bridge

Published on January 30 2017
  • Facebook Icon
  • Twitter Icon
  • LinkedIn Icon
  • Email Icon

The I-10 bridge consists of five spans, and each span of six lines of pre-fabricated pre-stressed squeezed girders, with a cast-on-site superstructure

Image New Mexico I10 Bridge

Previous bridge monitoring success with the New Mexico Highway Department resulted in the monitoring of the interstate highway bridge I-10 near Las Cruces, New Mexico. The I-10 bridge consists of five spans, and each span of six lines of pre-fabricated pre-stressed squeezed girders, with a cast-on-site superstructure. The girders cross-section has a “U” shape with wings. The girders were cast over pre-stressed strands in a prefabrication plant, and then steam cured over two days. After the cure was finished the strands were cut and the pre-stressing force brought in to the girders. The girders were stored for two months and then transported on-site where they were put in place and covered by cast-on-site superstructure slab.

Aim of monitoring:

The monitoring parameters are average strain, average shear strain, average curvature, deformed shape and pre-stress losses. For this purpose it was decided to equip all the girders of the fifth span, laying on abutment, with sensors in different configurations. First two girders were fully equipped with sensors. Crossed sensors necessary to evaluate the average shear strain were installed in the cross-section closest to abutment. Three non-coplanar sensors were installed in five cross-sections over girders in order to monitor both horizontal and vertical deformed shape. Finally the thermocouples were installed in three cross-sections in order to measure the temperature variations necessary to separate thermally generated strain from structural strain. Other girders were equipped with fewer sensors that are used as control and redundancy. Data analysis is performed using the SOFO VIEW software. The sensors were embedded in the girders during the fabrication. Thus they provided for full-life measurements of girders, including the very early age and pre-stressing. The system is fully centralized, and measurements are performed automatically from a control room built on-site.

Main results:

Measurements started immediately after the pouring. In this way the early and very early age deformation were recorded during the first three days. The deformation is later recorded during the prestress phase, after each strand was cut. Thus, real initial strain state of girders was stored. Continuous monitoring was also performed before transportation on-site, during transportation and during the pouring of the deck. In present, long-term monitoring is carried on. The results helped confirm both the theoretical models as well as the proper health of the bridge post construction. In addition concrete mechanical properties were calculated and compared to different models and codes.

INSTALLATION PERIODTYPE OF SENSORSNUMBER OF SENSORS
2004SOFO72

 

Image

View to the I10 bridge during the construction

Image

Global view to rebar cage with sensors and detail of crossed sensors

Image

View to a monitored girder during the storage; SOFO reading unit is behind the protective sheets

Image

View to control room built on-site and intermediate connection boxes installed on different girders

Image

Comparison of the total prestress losses by all methods

Image

Typical camber plot using sensor measurements

Image

Field Modulus of Elasticity vs. Empirical Predictions

Image

Average coefficient of thermal expansion for 28 days

Related Papers:

Fibre Optic Methods for Structural Health Monitoring, Branko Glisic and Daniele Inaudi, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd – 2007
Monitoring an Interstate Highway Bridge with a Built-In Fiberoptic Sensor System, R. L. Idriss, Z. Liang, 3RD International Conference on Bridge Maintenance, Safety and Management, Porto, Portugal, 16-19 July, 2006 – (To be published) – 2006
Finite Element Structural Monitoring Concept, Glisic B., Inaudi D., The 2nd fib International Congress June 5-8, 2006, Naples, Italy – (on conference CD, ID 17-18) – 2006
In-situ modulus of elasticity for a high performance concrete bridge, Erin A. Hughs, Zhiyong Liang, Rola L. Idriss and Craig M. Newtson , ACI Materials Journal – (Vol. 102, N0.6, pp.458-458.) – 2005

Related Applications

Bridge

Down arrow
close

Search Roctest

Searching...

Logo Roctest

Developer and Manufacturer of Geotechnical & Structural Instruments and Soil/Rock Testing Equipment

Logo Smartec

Provider of innovative Fiber Optic Solutions for Structural Health Monitoring and Geotechnical Instrumentation

Logo Telemac

Provider of Geotechnical & Structural Instruments
since 1947

Logo Enomfra

Provider of Hydrogeological & Geotechnical Services. Investigations, Monitoring & Testing

Logo Roctest

Developer and Manufacturer of Geotechnical & Structural Instruments and Soil/Rock Testing Equipment

Logo Smartec

Provider of innovative Fiber Optic Solutions for Structural Health Monitoring and Geotechnical Instrumentation

Logo Telemac

Provider of Geotechnical & Structural Instruments
since 1947

Logo Enomfra

Provider of Hydrogeological & Geotechnical Services. Investigations, Monitoring & Testing

Legal
  • Privacy Notice – May 2018
  • Terms and Conditions of Sales
  • Sitemap
Follow us
  • Logo linkedin
  • Logo youtube
Logo Logo